Thursday, November 28, 2019

Kelly Couch Essays (326 words) - Characters In Hamlet, Prince Hamlet

Kelly Couch 2/4/97 Per 1 Character Journal Hamlet The last couple days have been miserable for me. The sudden death of my father has complicated my whole life and is causing me much grief. As well, my girlfriend has apparently been forbidden to see me and I have no idea why. My mother is being a jerk. She has remarried after only 2 months of my fathers' horrible murder. He was the most wonderful man. He ruled fairly over all of Elsinore and his people were proud of him, but now he has been murdered. I WILL avenge his death though. My mom remarried Claudius, for a reason that only the gods know. My fathers' spirit says that he killed my father and that my mother was a sort of accomplice. This REALLY ticks me off! My own mother won't even explain why she married so fast, only that my father is dead and I should get over it. I am starting to hate the whole world. Polonius and Laertes told Ophilia that I couldn't see her anymore. I don't understand why. It makes no sense, why would they 'suddenly' care about our relations? It sure seems that EVERYONE is against me these days! I feel like committing suicide. But, before I get to that point, I must avenge my father. I am starting to plot how I will kill Claudius in my mind. I am not sure whether to make him suffer or just kind of blast him. My fathers' spirit has told me to leave my mother, Gertrude, to suffer until she dies. I sure hope that is a LONG time. She has helped to ruin the time that should be fun by allowing for my fathers death and remarriing so soon. I SHOULD be inhereting the throne. But no, my uncle is the new king and I must wait until he dies. Well, that won't be to long. I shall slay Claudius soon, avenging my father and me!

Sunday, November 24, 2019

The eNotes Blog The Library of Congresss NationalJukebox

The Library of Congresss NationalJukebox Last month, the Library of Congress made available, free of charge, its catalog of historic recordings of early music, dating from 1901 to 1925. The new National Jukebox contains some 10,000   recordings which have been digitized for the first time and were made available to the LOC by Sony Music Entertainment. Sony owns the rights to the records and is allowing the LOC to stream the digitized music free of charge. Anyone doing research in music history (or is just a fan of early American recordings) now has unprecedented access to works very few people have heard before. For example, acoustical recordings captured before the invention of microphones have now been transformed. How was music recorded before microphones? The LOC explains that   (m)usic and speech was funneled through recording horns, which in turn vibrated an attached diaphragm and stylus, thus etching the sound waves onto a rotating wax disc. Want to know what it was really like to hear the cacophony of New Yorks Tin Pan Alley at the turn of the twentieth century? Now you can! (Tin Pan Alley, by the way, got its name from the relentless pounding of musicians on their pianos, which some claimed sounded like banging on tin pans.) Perhaps you are researching or enjoy early opera. LOC has you covered. Pictured here is the 1919 Victrola Book of the Opera which describes more than 110 operas, and is reproduced here as an interactive digital facsimile. It includes plot synopses and lists of recordings the Victor Talking Machine Company offered in 1919. In addition to reading the original text, you can listen to nearly every recording listed in the book and even compare different interpretations of the most popular arias of the period. You can also search and listen to national treasures such as Irving Berlin, John Philip Sousa, and George M. Cohan, and many others. Ethnomusicologists will appreciate the hundreds of recordings available in dozens of languages, from Armenian to Welsh and everything in between. In addition to thousands of music recordings from dozens of genres, the National Jukebox has hundreds of spoken word recordings,   including comedy routines, courtroom recordings, and educational materials. The LOC plans to continuously add to its already vast collection. Each month it uploads new recordings and soon will include titles not just from Sony, but also from Columbia and Okeh, as well as selected master recordings from the Library of Congress Universal Music Group Collection.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Lab report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Lab Report Example Quiz I: Psychometric Analysis The 12 item quiz described as Quiz I was associated with a mean of 6.4 and an SD of 2.657 (min = 0, max = 12). The distribution of the total scores was not very normal with skew observed to be 0.111 and kurtosis to be -0.888. The Pearson correlations between the 12 items in the quiz are reported in table 1. This shows that while the test has otherwise acceptable psychometric properties, some items may need to be revised or removed. An item discrimination analysis was conducted to investigate the contribution of each item to the test. Specifically, D index values were estimated for each of the 12 items in the quiz based on splitting the sample into high (73rd percentile and above) and low (27th percentile and below) quiz performers in accordance with Kelly (1939). Based on a frequency table analysis of the ‘quiz I performance’ variable, the split corresponded to scores of 4 or lower being associated with the lower set while scores of 9 or hig her were associated with the higher set. Table 2 shows discriminatory index for each of the items, and it is evident that items 11 and 12 did not achieve a D index of more than 29%. This could mean that these items are poorly constructed or that they do not contribute to the test as well as the other items (Crocker & Algnia, 1986). The item total correlations also verify that these items contribute poorly to the quiz and have correlation coefficient s of less than 0.20. The internal consistency analysis conducted using the Cronbach’s ? was also marginally below the requisite 0.70 level (Nunnally & Brenstien, 1994) with a statistic value of 0.683. Given this data, it was believed that the quiz needed to be revised. Thus, items 12 and 11 were sequentially removed from the quiz and the Cronbach’s ? was re-estimated. The quiz was now composed of 10 items and was associated with an acceptable ? level of 0.734. The revised scale had a mean score of 5.128 with SD = 2.56 (min = 0, max = 10).the distribution of scores for the new quiz was also slightly more normalized with skew = 0.20 and kurtosis = -0.780. Quiz II: Psychometric analysis The 11 item quiz described as Quiz II was associated with a mean of 5.48 and an SD of 2.67 (min = 0, max = 11). The distribution of the total scores was approximately normal with skew observed to be 0.043 and kurtosis to be -0.8. The Pearson correlations between the 11 items in the quiz are reported in table 3. This shows that the test has acceptable psychometric properties. An item discrimination analysis was conducted to investigate the contribution of each item to the test. Specifically, D index values were estimated for each of the 11 items in the quiz based on splitting the sample into high (73rd percentile and above) and low (27th percentile and below) quiz performers in accordance with Kelly (1939). Based on a frequency table analysis of the quiz performance variable, the split corresponded to scores of 4 or lower being associated with the lower set while scores of 7 or higher were associated with the higher set. Table 4 shows discriminatory index for each of the items, all of which managed to achieve an acceptable D index (Crocker & Algnia, 1986). The item total correlations also verify that all items did contribute adequately to the quiz and